Search for: All records

ABSTRACT Here, we report on the raw and coassembled metatranscriptomes of 39 Lake Erie surface (1.0 m) water samples collected over a 2-day diel period encompassing episodic weather and bloom events. Preliminary taxonomic annotations and read mappings revealed thatMicrocystisspp. accounted for up to ~47% of the transcriptionally active community. 

Abstract A striking feature of Oxygen Deficient Zones (ODZs) on the eastern boundary of the Pacific Ocean are large subsurface plumes of iodide. Throughout the oceans, iodate is the predominant and thermodynamically favored species of dissolved iodine, but iodate is depleted within these plumes. The origin of iodide plumes and mechanism of reduction of iodate to iodide remains unclear but is thought to arise from a combination of in situ reduction and inputs from reducing shelf sediments. To distinguish between these sources, we investigated iodine redox speciation along the Oregon continental shelf. This upwelling system resembles ODZs but exhibits episodic hypoxia, rather than a persistently denitrifying water column. We observed elevated iodide in the benthic boundary layer overlying shelf sediments, but to a much smaller extent than within ODZs. There was no evidence of offshore plumes of iodide or increases in total dissolved iodine. Results suggest that an anaerobic water column dominated by denitrification, such as in ODZs, is required for iodate reduction. However, re‐analysis of iodine redox data from previous ODZ work suggests that most iodate reduction occurs in sediments, not the water column, and is also decoupled from denitrification. The underlying differences between these regimes have yet to be resolved, but could indicate a role for reduced sulfur in iodate reduction if the sulfate reduction zone is closer to the sediment‐water interface in ODZ shelf sediments than in Oregon sediments. Iodate reduction is not a simple function of oxygen depletion, which has important implications for its application as a paleoredox tracer. 

The E.3.3 mutation was generated in a Flp/FRT EMS screen for conditional mutations that cause growth and developmental defects in a genetic background that blocks apoptosis. The mutations were conditional, based on the Dark⁸²allele being present on the starting chromosome, and blocking canonical apoptosis in a homozygous state. The E.3.3 mosaic eyes exhibit defects in eye development including patches of rough eye and irregular surface structure. Whole Genome Sequencing and complementation mapping revealed E.3.3 as an allele of prod. Prod is a DNA-binding protein that binds satellite repeats and is involved in chromocenter formation during mitosis. Here we present a novel allele of prod, prod^E.3.3, that disrupts the functional region of the Prod protein resulting in disruption of typical eye structure, likely due to disruption of chromatid separation during development. 

Background Abundance of the commercially and ecologically important Eastern oyster, Crassostrea virginica , has declined across the US Eastern and Gulf coasts in recent decades, spurring substantial efforts to restore oyster reefs. These efforts are widely constrained by the availability, cost, and suitability of substrates to support oyster settlement and reef establishment. In particular, oyster shell is often the preferred substrate but is relatively scarce and increasingly expensive. Thus, there is a need for alternative oyster restoration materials that are cost-effective, abundant, and durable. Methods We tested the viability of two low-cost substrates—concrete and recycled blue crab ( Callinectes sapidus ) traps—in facilitating oyster recovery in a replicated 22-month field experiment at historically productive but now degraded intertidal oyster grounds on northwestern Florida’s Nature Coast. Throughout the trial, we monitored areal oyster cover on each substrate; at the end of the trial, we measured the densities of oysters by size class (spat, juvenile, and market-size) and the biomass and volume of each reef. Results Oysters colonized the concrete structures more quickly than the crab traps, as evidenced by significantly higher oyster cover during the first year of the experiment. By the end of the experiment, the concrete structures hosted higher densities of spat and juveniles, while the density of market-size oysters was relatively low and similar between treatments. The open structure of the crab traps led to the development of larger-volume reefs, while oyster biomass per unit area was similar between treatments. In addition, substrates positioned at lower elevations (relative to mean sea level) supported higher oyster abundance, size, and biomass than those less frequently inundated at higher elevations. Discussion Together, these findings indicate that both concrete and crab traps are viable substrates for oyster reef restoration, especially when placed at lower intertidal elevations conducive to oyster settlement and reef development.